Evidence and free utility
Browser tools, a source-checked Claim Ledger, and public examples gave visitors something real to inspect.
The site already contained useful tools, source-backed evidence, and paid creator services. The Fix Pack connected those parts into one answer without replacing the homepage.
The same deterministic v2 method scored the preserved pre-intervention source and the verified public after-state. Every check passed except the deliberately deferred, experimental two-point /llms.txt check.
Browser tools, a source-checked Claim Ledger, and public examples gave visitors something real to inspect.
The €149 Research Drop and €49 Script Audit existed on the creator page with honest scope and fit checks.
A visitor had to navigate and infer who ran the project, what could be requested, what it cost, and how to ask.
Experimental framing no longer described the live research-and-tools project or its current services.
This was not a generic “write more content” recommendation. The strongest move was to connect existing evidence, free utility, and paid work in one compact answer path.
Name Sarah; connect the Claim Ledger, representative evidence, both creator offers, price, fit, contact, and privacy without weakening the first viewport.
Replace the obsolete experiment language while preserving the editorial promise, rules, and privacy-conscious measurement explanation.
Publish Organization, WebSite, Service, and FAQ structured data that matches visible, confirmed claims.
Treat /llms.txt as an experimental convenience, not a ranking tactic or required production change.
/llms.txt recommendation was deliberately deferred.| Field | Before | Verified production after |
|---|---|---|
| Method | Deterministic v2.0.0 | Deterministic v2.0.0 |
| Score | 62/100 | 98/100 |
| Homepage words | 395 | 552 |
| Robots and sitemap | Present; 19 sitemap URLs | Verified HTTP 200; 19 sitemap URLs |
/llms.txt | Absent | HTTP 404; deliberately deferred |
Baseline provenance: the v2 before record is a frozen scan of the pre-intervention production source, not a raw v2 HTTP capture. A separate exact live v1 capture corroborates the same 395-word state, but its score is not used because the methodology differs. Hosting transforms delivered HTML bytes, so this is a same-methodology, source-lineage comparison—not a byte-identical HTTP comparison.
It establishes that LossyInfo now makes its operator, evidence, offer, price, fit, contact route, policy, and structured identity easier to establish from public inputs.
It does not establish improved rankings, AI citations, traffic, leads, conversion, revenue, or model preference. The ModularDot score is a declared deterministic QA metric—not an external industry benchmark.
NostalgAI required both editorial changes and verified privacy, robots, and sitemap routes in its actual production architecture.